From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Crow

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
May 25, 2023
No. CIV-23-270-R (W.D. Okla. May. 25, 2023)

Opinion

CIV-23-270-R

05-25-2023

DEVEYON EDREACE WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. SCOTT CROW, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

DAVID L. RUSSELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Upon review of the file and noting no timely objection to the findings and recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5], in its entirety.

For the reasons stated therein, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling. Further, the court concludes that a certificate of appealability should not issue because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Crow

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
May 25, 2023
No. CIV-23-270-R (W.D. Okla. May. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. Crow

Case Details

Full title:DEVEYON EDREACE WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. SCOTT CROW, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: May 25, 2023

Citations

No. CIV-23-270-R (W.D. Okla. May. 25, 2023)