From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Crothall Healthcare, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 8, 2020
17 CIVIL 1011 (LAK (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2020)

Opinion

17 CIVIL 1011 (LAK

10-08-2020

RUTHERFORD WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CROTHALL HEALTHCARE, INC., SODEXO INC., and JOHN DOE CORP., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated October 7, 2020, substantially for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger [Dkt. 62], defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint [Dkts. 45, 50] are granted; Plaintiff's objections [Dkt. 66] are denied as untimely and, alternatively, are overruled. Dated: New York, New York

October 8, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Williams v. Crothall Healthcare, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 8, 2020
17 CIVIL 1011 (LAK (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. Crothall Healthcare, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RUTHERFORD WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CROTHALL HEALTHCARE, INC., SODEXO INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 8, 2020

Citations

17 CIVIL 1011 (LAK (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2020)

Citing Cases

Cukar v. Compass Grp.

Thus, having recovered damages under the NYWCL, Plaintiff cannot recover from Defendants for the injuries…