From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Crocette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2030-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2030-CMK-P

10-28-2011

DELBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. SABINA F. CROCETTE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 2, 2011, the court directed plaintiff to resolve the fee status for this case within 30 days of the date of the order. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders and rules. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not complied by either paying the full filing fee or filing a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court provided plaintiff with an application for him to complete and return. Plaintiff failed to complete the application, returning a blank application to the court instead.

Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to resolve fees. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Crocette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2030-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Crocette

Case Details

Full title:DELBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. SABINA F. CROCETTE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2030-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)