From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILLIAMS v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER RIES

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 15, 2006
Case No. 05-70432 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 15, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-70432.

February 15, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and to Extend Time to Respond to Summary Judgment Motion [Docket #28].

On February 8, 2006, the undersigned filed a Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Assuming that the District Judge adopts the Report and Recommendation, the case will be dismissed, obviating the need for discovery. Nor is discovery necessary for the Court to determine whether the claims are exhausted. Accordingly, the Motion to Compel will be DENIED.

Further, the Court had the benefit of reviewing Plaintiff's Declaration in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket #33]. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

WILLIAMS v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER RIES

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 15, 2006
Case No. 05-70432 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 15, 2006)
Case details for

WILLIAMS v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER RIES

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER DEBORAH A. RIES…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 15, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-70432 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 15, 2006)