From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
549 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7546

12-24-2013

ROBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICE, Al ET; MAJID ARNAOUT, Dr.; COLIN OTTEY, Dr.; KATIE WINNER, PA; BILL BEIMMEN, Nurse; DAWN HAWK, Nurse; CARLA BUCK, Nurse; A. JOUBERT, Dr.; GREG FLURY, P.A.; NAA E. ODIFIE, R. Ph., Defendants - Appellees.

Robert Williams, Appellant Pro Se. H. Kenneth Armstrong, ARMSTRONG, DONAHUE, CEPPOS & VAUGHAN, CHTD, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:12-cv-02121-DKC) Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Williams, Appellant Pro Se. H. Kenneth Armstrong, ARMSTRONG, DONAHUE, CEPPOS & VAUGHAN, CHTD, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams' motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv., No. 8:12-cv-02121-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
549 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICE, Al ET…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 24, 2013

Citations

549 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2013)