From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Coren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1985
112 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 29, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassa County (Levitt, J.).


Order dated June 4, 1984, affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, on condition that plaintiff pays appellant $250 within 30 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry; in the event that condition is not complied with, order reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, order dated March 20, 1984 vacated, and motion to strike the complaint granted.

We do not find that the plaintiff has acted in a willful or contumacious manner to frustrate or thwart the disclosure sought so as to warrant the imposition of a sanction specifically set forth in CPLR 3126 ( cf. Kramme v. Town of Hempstead, 100 A.D.2d 447, 451). However, under the circumstances of this case, including the dilatory tactics employed by the plaintiff, the sanction imposed is warranted. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. Coren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1985
112 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Williams v. Coren

Case Details

Full title:COZY WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. ADRIAN R. COREN, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Sawh v. Bridges

In conclusion, while we recognize that dismissal of a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 is a harsh sanction, it…

Mulvey v. Service Systems Corp.

We also agree that because there is uncertainty as to when the witness, Keith Sakowsky, ceased to be employed…