From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Commonwealth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 14, 2022
No. 21-6666 (4th Cir. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

21-6666

12-14-2022

RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent-Appellee

Richard Leo Williams, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 28, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cv-00958-CMH-JFA)

Richard Leo Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Richard Leo Williams seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for appointment of counsel and an evidentiary hearing, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Commonwealth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 14, 2022
No. 21-6666 (4th Cir. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

No. 21-6666 (4th Cir. Dec. 14, 2022)