From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Clark

Supreme Court of Alabama
Aug 18, 1955
263 Ala. 228 (Ala. 1955)

Opinion

5 Div. 613.

August 18, 1955.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Chambers County, Will O. Walton, J.

Chas. E. Fuller, Jr., LaFayette, for appellants.

Hines Hines, LaFayette, for appellee.


This appeal comes to us from the Circuit Court of Chambers County, in Equity, wherein that court settled a boundary line dispute between coterminous owners in favor of the appellee. The record is incomplete in that it does not contain the testimony of witnesses heard by the judge in open court and relied upon by him in his final decree.

Where no testimony is contained in the record, a decree which recites that it was granted on the pleadings, proofs, and testimony of witnesses will not be disturbed on appeal. Collins v. Loval, 56 Ala. 403. Further, it will be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict, finding, judgment or decree where all the evidence is not in the record. — State v. Donaldson, 209 Ala. 400, 96 So. 617; Mooneyham v. Herring, 210 Ala. 168, 97 So. 638; 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, 907(4).

Finally, it will be conclusively presumed on appeal that evidence omitted from the record but heard by the court would sustain the judgment. Broughton v. Broughton, 17 Ala. App. 255, 84 So. 635.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL and MAYFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. Clark

Supreme Court of Alabama
Aug 18, 1955
263 Ala. 228 (Ala. 1955)
Case details for

Williams v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:Willis WILLIAMS et al. v. Leola CLARK

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Aug 18, 1955

Citations

263 Ala. 228 (Ala. 1955)
82 So. 2d 295

Citing Cases

West v. West

The presumption must be indulged that the omitted evidence gave support to the findings of the trial court.…

United Insurance Company of America v. Ray

Where it is apparent from the record that the trial court had before it evidence omitted from the record, it…