From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 26, 2013
109 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-09-26

Timothy H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant–Respondent.

Timothy H. Williams, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Diana Lawless of counsel), for respondent.


Timothy H. Williams, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Diana Lawless of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered August 18, 2010, which denied plaintiff's CPLR 4404(a) motion to set aside the jury's verdict in this case alleging intentional tort, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that the jury's verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744, 746, 631 N.Y.S.2d 122, 655 N.E.2d 163 [1995] ). The testimony of plaintiff and defendant's witness offered conflicting accounts of the events at issue. The jury weighed the credibility of the witnesses and the evidence and reached its conclusion based on a fair interpretation of the evidence.

We have considered the parties' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

GONZALEZ, P.J. MAZZARELLI, ACOSTA, RENWICK, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 26, 2013
109 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:Timothy H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6066
971 N.Y.S.2d 442

Citing Cases

Lewis v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

"[A] successful party is entitled to a presumption that the jury adopted a reasonable view of the evidence"…

Gibson v. Batia Realty Corp.

The jury weighed the evidence, and the credibility of Felix, as well that of defendant Sasouness, and chose…