From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 2, 2024
23-CV-10807 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-10807 (LTS)

01-02-2024

NORBERT S. WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff brings this action pro se. Plaintiff submitted the complaint without a signature. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name - or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” See also Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 11(a) to require “as it did in John Hancock's day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced).” Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001).

Plaintiff's complaint is missing the signature page. He is directed to submit the signature page to the court within thirty days of the date of this order. A copy of the signature page is attached to the order.

No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

VII. PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATION AND WARNINGS

By signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief that: (1) the complaint is not being presented for an improper purpose (such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation); (2) the claims are supported by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument to change existing law; (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the complaint otherwise complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.

I understand that if I file three or more cases while I am a prisoner that are dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, I may be denied in forma pauperis status in future cases.

I also understand that prisoners must exhaust administrative procedures before filing an action in federal court about prison conditions, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and that my case may be dismissed if I have not exhausted administrative remedies as required.

I agree to provide the Clerk's Office with any changes to my address. I understand that my failure to keep a current address on file with the Clerk's Office may result in the dismissal of my case.

Each Plaintiff must sign and date the complaint. Attach additional pages if necessary. If seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees, each plaintiff must also submit an IFP application.


Summaries of

Williams v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 2, 2024
23-CV-10807 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Williams v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:NORBERT S. WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

23-CV-10807 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)