From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. City of Medford

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 21, 2011
No. l:09-cv-03026-PA (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. l:09-cv-03026-PA

November 21, 2011.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Defendants have filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C);McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#68) is adopted. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#45) is denied except as to the individual defendants on the state law claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. City of Medford

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 21, 2011
No. l:09-cv-03026-PA (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. City of Medford

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMS v. CITY OF MEDFORD

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 21, 2011

Citations

No. l:09-cv-03026-PA (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2011)