From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Citibank, N.A.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2008
07 Civ. 6680 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2008)

Opinion

07 Civ. 6680 (RJH).

August 25, 2008


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


On July 17, 2008, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint without prejudice and granted Plaintiff leave to amend to include allegations establishing the applicability of the "false name exception" of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"). The Court allowed Plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. Because more than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, Plaintiff's FDCPA claim is dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise pendent jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state claims, which are dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of the court is requested to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Citibank, N.A.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2008
07 Civ. 6680 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. Citibank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A. and CITIBANK, (SOUTH DAKOTA)…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 25, 2008

Citations

07 Civ. 6680 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2008)