From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals
Feb 2, 1988
419 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

Docket No. 88959.

Decided February 2, 1988. Leave to appeal applied for.

Harvey Covensky, P.C. (by Harvey Covensky), for plaintiff.

Lacy Jones (by Stephen Jay Schwartz), for Chrysler Corporation.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Ray W. Cardew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General.

Before: CYNAR, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and D.F. WALSH, JJ.


AFTER REMAND


Following this Court's remand in Williams v Chrysler Corp, 159 Mich. App. 8; 406 N.W.2d 222 (1987), the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board found that plaintiff had not sustained his burden of proving that the atmospheric conditions at his former place of employment, rather than his cigarette smoking, caused or aggravated his bronchial asthma. Because there was competent evidence to support the WCAB'S findings of fact, we affirm. Williams, supra, p 11.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals
Feb 2, 1988
419 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Williams v. Chrysler Corp.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMS v CHRYSLER CORPORATION (AFTER REMAND)

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 2, 1988

Citations

419 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988)
419 N.W.2d 782