From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Cdcr

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 23, 2013
2:13-cv-1791 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion


RICHARD G. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-1791 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 23, 2013

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff has consented to this court's jurisdiction. (ECF No. 5.) By an order filed November 6, 2013, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint that stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 6.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an amended complaint.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Williams v. Cdcr

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 23, 2013
2:13-cv-1791 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Cdcr

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD G. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-1791 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)