From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILLIAMS v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-00468 OWW JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-00468 OWW JLT (PC).

October 17, 2011


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING (Doc. 96)


On October 14, 2011, Defendants requested, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to be allowed to conduct the deposition of Plaintiff via video conference. Defendants explain that the trip from their office in Sacramento to Salinas Valley State Prison, the institution of Plaintiff's incarceration, would take three and one half hours.

Good cause appearing, Defendants' October 14, 2011, request for video conferencing (Doc. 96) is GRANTED. However, nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain video conferencing equipment if it is not already available.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

WILLIAMS v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-00468 OWW JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

WILLIAMS v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN B. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-00468 OWW JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)