From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Brar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 28, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01372-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01372-SKO PC

08-28-2012

MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. H. BRAR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT IN COMPLIANCE

WITH SCREENING ORDER WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS


(Doc. 10)

Plaintiff Michael B. Williams, a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 18, 2011. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Court's orders denying Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief and for reconsideration on July 11, 2012, and mandate issued on August 3, 2012.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court's screening order within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order or this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Brar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 28, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01372-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Brar

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. H. BRAR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01372-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2012)