From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Braida

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
No. CIV S-08-1138 FCD GGH (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1138 FCD GGH (TEMP) P.

February 7, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 20, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 43) is denied.

DATED: February 7, 2011


Summaries of

Williams v. Braida

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
No. CIV S-08-1138 FCD GGH (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Braida

Case Details

Full title:DONALD LEE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. A. BRAIDA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 7, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1138 FCD GGH (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)