From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Bedinfield

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 2, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv479/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Feb. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05cv479/MCR/MD.

February 2, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated December 30, 2005. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed without prejudice as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process.

3. This case is also dismissed pursuant to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as Plaintiff has had in the past one district court case dismissed for failure to state a claim, another district court case dismissed as frivolous, and one appeal dismissed as frivolous.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Bedinfield

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 2, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv479/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Feb. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Williams v. Bedinfield

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BILL BEDINFIELD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Feb 2, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:05cv479/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Feb. 2, 2006)