From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
22-cv-01466-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-01466-HSG

06-14-2022

ROBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DISMISSAL

RE: DKT. NO. 6

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM; JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kim's Report and Recommendation Re Dismissal. The time for objections has passed and none were filed. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it except that the dismissal shall be without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
22-cv-01466-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2022

Citations

22-cv-01466-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)