From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Chief Medical Officer Bal

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1697 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1697 JAM GGH P.

February 17, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2011 the undersigned issued a Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 16) that the action be dismissed. However, language was not included that informed plaintiff of his ability to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations. That language is below.

Plaintiff is informed that the findings and recommendations issued February 10, 2011, (Doc. 16) are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: February 16, 2011


Summaries of

Williams v. Chief Medical Officer Bal

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1697 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Chief Medical Officer Bal

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER BAL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 17, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1697 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2011)