From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Sep 21, 2010
Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-138 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-138 (HL).

September 21, 2010


ORDER


The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, entered August 27, 2010 (Doc. 18), is before the Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Commissioner's decision in Plaintiff's Social Security appeal be affirmed.

Plaintiff did not file a written objection to the Recommendation, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's decision. Accordingly, the Court accepts the Recommendation (Doc. 18). The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Sep 21, 2010
Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-138 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Williams v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT WILLIAMS JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-138 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 21, 2010)