From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Armel

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 5, 2024
4:23-CV-0421 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-CV-0421

11-05-2024

RASHAWN J. WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. WARDEN ARMEL, Respondent


ORDER

JULIA K. MUNLEY, JUDGE

AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner Rashawn J. Williams' petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED.

2. A certificate of appealability shall not issue, as Williams has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this court's procedural rulings are correct, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Williams v. Armel

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 5, 2024
4:23-CV-0421 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Williams v. Armel

Case Details

Full title:RASHAWN J. WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. WARDEN ARMEL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 5, 2024

Citations

4:23-CV-0421 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2024)