From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Apfel

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Oct 12, 2000
CA 00-0176-CB-C (S.D. Ala. Oct. 12, 2000)

Opinion

CA 00-0176-CB-C.

October 12, 2000.


JUDGMENT


In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying claimant benefits be reversed and this cause is hereby remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings. The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes the plaintiff a prevailing party under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993), and terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this matter.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated September 20, 2000 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

Williams v. Apfel

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Oct 12, 2000
CA 00-0176-CB-C (S.D. Ala. Oct. 12, 2000)
Case details for

Williams v. Apfel

Case Details

Full title:BEATRICE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Oct 12, 2000

Citations

CA 00-0176-CB-C (S.D. Ala. Oct. 12, 2000)