From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 24, 2010
384 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1237.

Submitted: June 17, 2010.

Decided: June 24, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:08-cv-O3432-JFA).

Randy Williams, Mary Williams, Appellants Pro Se. Clayton Monroe Custer, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge Rice, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Randy and Mary Williams appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on the Williams's civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs' motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc., No. 3:08-cv-03432-JFA, 2010 WL 569735 (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 24, 2010
384 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Randy WILLIAMS; Mary Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. APAC ATLANTIC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 24, 2010

Citations

384 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2010)