From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-0051 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0051 KJM CKD P

12-13-2021

LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 1, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 1, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. The First Amendment claims against defendants Muñoz and Allison are dismissed without leave to amend;

3. This case is proceeding on the Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Munoz; and

4. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings.


Summaries of

Williams v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-0051 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0051 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)