From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Allard

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 31, 2007
9:03-CV-1054 (LEK/GJD) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2007)

Opinion

9:03-CV-1054 (LEK/GJD).

August 31, 2007


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 10, 2007, by the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 14).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Gustave J. DiBianco's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) be DENIED AND DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Allard

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 31, 2007
9:03-CV-1054 (LEK/GJD) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2007)
Case details for

Williams v. Allard

Case Details

Full title:EDMOND TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT ALLARD…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Aug 31, 2007

Citations

9:03-CV-1054 (LEK/GJD) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

Peters v. Graham

Under New York law, "either the defendant or the prosecutor may submit a pre-sentence memorandum setting…