Opinion
6228 Index 155569/16
04-05-2018
Bisogno & Meyerson LLP, Brooklyn (George D. Silva of counsel), for appellant. Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP, New York (Steven H. Rosenfeld of counsel), for respondent.
Bisogno & Meyerson LLP, Brooklyn (George D. Silva of counsel), for appellant.
Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP, New York (Steven H. Rosenfeld of counsel), for respondent.
Acosta, P.J., Tom, Oing, Moulton, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered February 3, 2017, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, and denied plaintiff's cross motion to amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The complaint alleges that on April 12, 2015, plaintiff was "assaulted, struck, grabbed, battered, beaten, punched, thrown, and seriously injured" by defendant's employee. Contrary to plaintiff's argument, these allegations do not assert a claim sounding in negligence, but rather allege the intentional tort of assault, which is governed by a one-year statute of limitations ( CPLR 215[3] ). Accordingly, the July 5, 2016 complaint was properly dismissed as untimely (see Smiley v. North Gen. Hosp., 59 A.D.3d 179, 872 N.Y.S.2d 456 [1st Dept. 2009] ).
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff's cross motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for negligent hiring and retention. Plaintiff failed to show that the proffered amendment was "not palpably insufficient or clearly devoid of merit" ( Cruz v. Brown, 129 A.D.3d 455, 456, 11 N.Y.S.3d 33 [1st Dept. 2015] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Since the complaint sought to impose liability under the principle of respondeat superior, there can be no claim for negligent hiring and retention (see De La Cruz v. Dalmida, 151 A.D.3d 563, 564, 54 N.Y.S.3d 279 [1st Dept. 2017] ).