From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams et Ux. v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
May 27, 1931
135 So. 139 (Fla. 1931)

Opinion

Opinion filed May 27, 1931.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County; DeWitt T. Gray, Judge.

Affirmed.

S. B. Jennings and Fred M. Burns, for Appellants;

Kay, Adams, Ragland Kurz, for Appellee.


The appeal in this case is from an order granting a motion to strike a part of paragraph 1 and all of paragraph 4 of an answer attempting to set up an affirmative defense to an amended bill to foreclose a mortgage.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Ray vs. Williams, 55 Fla. 723, 46 So. 158; Busch vs. Baker, 79 Fla. 113, 83 So. 704; and Davis Mercantile Co. vs. Gillette, 82 Fla. 340, 90 So. 189, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P.J., AND TERRELL AND DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.


Summaries of

Williams et Ux. v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
May 27, 1931
135 So. 139 (Fla. 1931)
Case details for

Williams et Ux. v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:SIMON F. WILLIAMS and MARY S. WILLIAMS, his wife, Appellants, vs. JOSEPH…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: May 27, 1931

Citations

135 So. 139 (Fla. 1931)
135 So. 139

Citing Cases

Williams et al. v. Dunn

PER CURIAM. — An interlocutory order herein, striking a portion of the answer in a mortgage foreclosure, was…