Opinion
January 12, 1999.
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.).
The trial court properly awarded plaintiff 50% of the commission it claims was due based on the finding, amply supported by the record, that there were two procuring brokers. However, the same reasons that warranted the trial court's reliance on the attachment to plaintiff's written offer for the purpose of determining the amount of the commission also warranted reliance on that attachment for the purposes of determining the interest payable on the commission and plaintiff's right to a future commission in the event of a renewal of the lease, and we modify accordingly.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.