From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William a v. Mazurkiewicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1209 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-1209

09-27-2012

WILLIAM A, KEITEL, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, Respondent.


District JudgeNora Barry Fischer


MEMORANDUM ORDER

On September 18, 2011, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) and was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on August 20, 2012 (ECF No. 20) recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that a certificate of appealability be denied. On September 24, 2012, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22). Petitioner's objections do not undermine the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which is based upon the correct application of the law set forth in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2012:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

____________________

Nora Barry Fischer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

William a v. Mazurkiewicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1209 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2012)
Case details for

William a v. Mazurkiewicz

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A, KEITEL, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-1209 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2012)