From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willet v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 7, 2016
627 F. App'x 580 (8th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-1818

01-07-2016

Harlan Hall Willet, Jr. Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jason Smith; Brad Wittrock; Daniel Pingel Defendants Jerry Burch; Jayla Graybill Defendants - Appellants Sean Morris Defendant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Jerry Burch and Jayla Graybill--employees of the Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offenders (CCUSO) in Iowa--appeal the denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by CCUSO patient Harlan Willet, Jr.. Upon careful de novo review of the record and consideration of the parties' briefs, we conclude that the admissible evidence before the district court could not, as a matter of law, support a determination that Burch and Graybill violated Willet's clearly established Fourteenth Amendment right to substantive due process. See Jones v. McNeese, 746 F.3d 887, 899-900 (8th Cir.) (qualified immunity standard), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 688 (2014). Accordingly, the order of the district court denying Burch and Graybill summary judgment on their qualified immunity defenses is reversed, and the case is remanded for entry of judgment in favor of Burch and Graybill.


Summaries of

Willet v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 7, 2016
627 F. App'x 580 (8th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Willet v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Harlan Hall Willet, Jr. Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jason Smith; Brad…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jan 7, 2016

Citations

627 F. App'x 580 (8th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

West v. Palmer

The defendants appealed, and in an unpublished per curiam decision, the Eighth Circuit found the defendants…