Opinion
Argued March 12, 1895
Decided April 9, 1895
E.B. Barnum for appellant.
Arthur H. Smith for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur except PECKHAM, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Willdigg v. City of Brooklyn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1895
41 N.E. 88 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Willdigg v. City of Brooklyn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1895
41 N.E. 88 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Willdigg v. City of Brooklyn
Case Details
Full title:KETURAH WILLDIGG, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . THE CITY OF…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 9, 1895
Citations
41 N.E. 88 (N.Y. 1895)
145 N.Y. 640
67 N.Y. St. Rptr. 901