From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willadsen v. Willadsen

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 10, 1973
198 S.E.2d 318 (Ga. 1973)

Opinion

27867.

SUBMITTED APRIL 9, 1973.

DECIDED MAY 10, 1973.

Divorce. Hall Superior Court. Before Judge Blackshear.

John N. Crudup. for appellant.

Whelchel, Dunlap Gignilliat, Weyman H. Forrester, for appellee.


This appeal from the grant of a divorce is without merit.

The trial judge heard the case without a jury. His judgment does not disclose any details of the evidence adduced or what rulings were made in respect thereto. The appeal is unaccompanied by a transcript of the proceedings or an acceptable substitute and none appears to be available. The only errors argued and insisted upon, a ruling on the admissibility of testimony and the refusal to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, necessarily require a consideration of what transpired at the trial.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED APRIL 9, 1973 — DECIDED MAY 10, 1973.


Summaries of

Willadsen v. Willadsen

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 10, 1973
198 S.E.2d 318 (Ga. 1973)
Case details for

Willadsen v. Willadsen

Case Details

Full title:WILLADSEN v. WILLADSEN

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 10, 1973

Citations

198 S.E.2d 318 (Ga. 1973)
230 Ga. 607

Citing Cases

Purcell v. Purcell

Since no transcript was made of the interlocutory hearing, there is no basis for reversing the foregoing…

Herring v. Herring

This in itself requires an affirmance of the judgment. Dunaway v. Beam, 129 Ga. App. 220 ( 199 S.E.2d 395);…