Will v. Pepose Vision Inst., P.C.

Full title: Jaynee WILL, Plaintiff/Respondent, and Scott Will, Plaintiff, v. PEPOSE…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Jun 11, 2013

400 S.W.3d 864 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 97910.

2013-06-11

Jaynee WILL, Plaintiff/Respondent, and Scott Will, Plaintiff, v. PEPOSE VISION INSTITUTE, P.C., Defendant/Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Michael T. Jamison, Judge. Teresa Young, Angela Pozzo, co-counsel, Philip Willman, co-counsel, Andrew Eastman, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Leonard Cervantes, Jennifer Suttmoeller, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Michael T. Jamison, Judge.
Teresa Young, Angela Pozzo, co-counsel, Philip Willman, co-counsel, Andrew Eastman, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Leonard Cervantes, Jennifer Suttmoeller, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pepose Vision Institute, P.C. appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting Jaynee Will and Scott Will's motion for new trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).