Opinion
No. 3:14-cv-00754-JE
06-20-2016
SHERRY WILL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,
On May 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued his Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [24], recommending that the Commissioner's final decision should be REVERSED and this action REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed.
DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [24] as my own opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 20 day of June, 2016.
/s/ Michael W. Mosman
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN
Chief United States District Judge