Wilkins v. State

Full title: Nathan Lee WILKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: May 18, 2022

338 So. 3d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-0713

05-18-2022

Nathan Lee WILKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Nathan Lee Wilkins, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Nathan Lee Wilkins, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleadings pending below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Colville v. State , 335 So.3d 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022), citing Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Makar, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.