Opinion
21-7272
02-22-2022
ROBERT WILKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID SHAW, Administrator; JAMES MCVIGOR, Sheriff; PHIL CORBETT, Chief; ELAINE TANSKI, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees, and UNITED STATES MARSHALS, Defendant.
Robert Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 17, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03031-D)
Robert Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.
James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Robert Wilkins appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of four individually named defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Shaw, No. 5:20-ct-03031-D (E.D. N.C. Aug. 20, 2021). We grant Wilkins' motion to amend in part, insofar as he seeks to supplement the arguments in his informal brief, but deny the motion to amend in part, insofar as Wilkins seeks substantive relief from the district court's order. We deny Wilkins' request for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.