Wilkins v. Peters

Full title: EARL DOUGLAS WILKINS, Plaintiff, v. COLETTE S. PETERS, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 25, 2017

6:16-cv-00319-SB (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2017)

Opinion

6:16-cv-00319-SB

07-25-2017

EARL DOUGLAS WILKINS, Plaintiff, v. COLETTE S. PETERS, et al., Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and Recommendation (#31) on June 20, 2017, in which she recommends the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion (#14) for Summary Judgment and grant Defendants' Motion (#21) for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9^th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9^th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation (#31) and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#14) for Summary Judgment and GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#21) for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25^th day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge