From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkins v. Gipson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2022
2:19-cv-01469 JAM CKD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01469 JAM CKD (PC)

06-03-2022

KEENAN WILKINS, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Keenan Wilkins, a California inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action against several individual defendants, including Defendant Miller. See Doc. No. 22. Defendants move to amend their Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint to correctly identify Defendant Miller as “T. Miller.” See Doc. No. 68. Upon due consideration, good cause appearing and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion and ORDERS Defendants to file their Amended Answer, attached as Exhibit A to their motion, within five (5) days from the date this Order is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilkins v. Gipson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2022
2:19-cv-01469 JAM CKD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Wilkins v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:KEENAN WILKINS, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-01469 JAM CKD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)