From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkewitz v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 2, 1999
10 S.W.3d 164 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED 75269.

November 2, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HONORABLE GRACE NICHOLS, JUDGE.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kenneth P. Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.


ORDER


Movant Barry Wilkewitz appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wilkewitz v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 2, 1999
10 S.W.3d 164 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Wilkewitz v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARRY WILKEWITZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Nov 2, 1999

Citations

10 S.W.3d 164 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)