From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkerson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 4, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-1518 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-1518 LKK KJN P

12-04-2013

ROGER WILKERSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed October 18, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

____________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Wilkerson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 4, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-1518 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Wilkerson v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:ROGER WILKERSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 4, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-1518 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)