From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WILKENING v. VEOLIA ES EVERGREEN LANDFILL

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia
Nov 30, 2011
Civil Action 7:10-CV-122 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:10-CV-122 (HL).

November 30, 2011.


ORDER


The Court has received a letter dated November 29, 2011 from counsel for Defendants in which he seeks permission to file a motion to strike portions of the affidavit submitted by Plaintiff in support of his reply brief in support of his summary judgment motion. From this and the letter submitted by defense counsel on November 21, 2011, the Court understands that Defendants contend there are inherent inconsistencies between Plaintiff's deposition testimony and his affidavit testimony. If that is in fact the case, the Court will deal with that issue when ruling on the summary judgment motion. In the Court's opinion, an additional round of briefing on that matter is not necessary.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

WILKENING v. VEOLIA ES EVERGREEN LANDFILL

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia
Nov 30, 2011
Civil Action 7:10-CV-122 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

WILKENING v. VEOLIA ES EVERGREEN LANDFILL

Case Details

Full title:WILKENING v. VEOLIA ES EVERGREEN LANDFILL

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

Civil Action 7:10-CV-122 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 30, 2011)