From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilfoung v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 15, 2013
1:11CV942 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

1:11CV942 1:04CR495-2

04-15-2013

ANTONIO JAMAL WILFOUNG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

On March 6, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed a Notice [Doc. #164] that no objections would be filed and the time has run for the Government to file objections. Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #161] is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence [Doc. #131] is GRANTED. The Judgment [Doc. #54] is VACATED, and the Clerk is directed to set this matter for resentencing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion [Doc. #134] supplementing his § 2255 Motion is DENIED without prejudice to Petitioner raising any arguments regarding the proper application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines at his resentencing. Petitioner remains in custody and the United States Attorney is directed to produce Petitioner for the resentencing hearing. The Probation Office is directed to prepare a Supplement to the Presentence Investigation Report in advance of the hearing. Counsel will be appointed to represent Petitioner at the resentencing hearing.

________________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wilfoung v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 15, 2013
1:11CV942 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Wilfoung v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO JAMAL WILFOUNG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

1:11CV942 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2013)