From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiley v. State

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO
Nov 12, 2014
475 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

ED 100116

11-12-2014

Todd Wiley, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Jessica Hathaway, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Movant/Appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent


Jessica Hathaway, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Movant/Appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Todd Wiley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.
--------


Summaries of

Wiley v. State

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO
Nov 12, 2014
475 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Wiley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Todd Wiley, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Court:In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO

Date published: Nov 12, 2014

Citations

475 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)