From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilds v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 10, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00131-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00131-MP-WCS.

March 10, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 16, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which recommends that the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff's application for disability and supplemental security income benefits be affirmed. After a thorough review of the record, the Magistrate Judge concluded that "the findings of the Administrative Law Judge were based upon substantial evidence in the record and correctly followed the law." Doc. 16 at 25. Plaintiff has not objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 16, is ADOPTED and incorporated herein.
2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is AFFIRMED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2011


Summaries of

Wilds v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 10, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00131-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Wilds v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOHN C. WILDS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00131-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2011)