From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wildman v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2018
Case No. CV 16-08570 JLS (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-08570 JLS (JDE)

03-06-2018

DANIEL C. WILDMAN, Petitioner, v. E. ARNOLD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Traverse, and Motion to Stay filed by Petitioner, the Answer and Opposition to the Motion to Stay filed by Respondent, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) The Motion to Stay (Dkt. 26) is DENIED;

(2) Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and

(3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: March 6, 2018

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wildman v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2018
Case No. CV 16-08570 JLS (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Wildman v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL C. WILDMAN, Petitioner, v. E. ARNOLD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 16-08570 JLS (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2018)