From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilder v. Woods

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
Nov 16, 2020
Case No. 0:19-cv-02691-SAL (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 0:19-cv-02691-SAL

11-16-2020

Christopher T. Wilder, Plaintiff, v. LT Woods, Cpt. Bradham, SGT James Williams, SGT Walker, SGT Wiggins, Major Washington, SGT Hanes, Warden Lervern Cohen, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court for review of the August 24, 2020 Report and Recommendation ("Report") of United States Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). [ECF No. 57]. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this action be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that any pending motions be terminated. Id. No party filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has passed.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this Court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, the Court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must "only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough review of the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the Court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, and incorporates the Report by reference herein. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and the pending motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 48, is moot and should be terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Sherri A. Lydon

Sherri A. Lydon

United States District Judge

November 16, 2020

Florence, South Carolina


Summaries of

Wilder v. Woods

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
Nov 16, 2020
Case No. 0:19-cv-02691-SAL (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Wilder v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:Christopher T. Wilder, Plaintiff, v. LT Woods, Cpt. Bradham, SGT James…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

Date published: Nov 16, 2020

Citations

Case No. 0:19-cv-02691-SAL (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2020)