From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilder v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Feb 25, 2003
99 S.W.3d 62 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81109

February 25, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis; Philip J. Sweeney, Judge.

Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Adriane Dixon Crouse, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, C.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Robert E. Crist, Sr. J.



ORDER


Ronald Wilder ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises two points claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wilder v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Feb 25, 2003
99 S.W.3d 62 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Wilder v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD WILDER, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Feb 25, 2003

Citations

99 S.W.3d 62 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)