From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilder v. Greidinger

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 4, 2008
286 F. App'x 12 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1131.

Submitted: July 31, 2008.

Decided: August 4, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cv-02283-WDQ).

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Marc Alan Greidinger, Springfield, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court's orders denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reopen his 1997 breach of contract action, and his motion to vacate the denial of the motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Greidinger, No. 1:97-cv-02283-WDQ (D.Md. Dec. 5, 2007 Dec. 17, 2007). We deny Wilder's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Wilder v. Greidinger

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 4, 2008
286 F. App'x 12 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Wilder v. Greidinger

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marc Alan…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 4, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 12 (4th Cir. 2008)