From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wildee v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 3, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0163 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0163 GEB DAD P.

April 3, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a fourth request for the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's March 21, 2007 fourth request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Wildee v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 3, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0163 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Wildee v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD LUJEAN WILDEE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN FELKER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 3, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0163 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007)